Honest comparison, May 2026

ScopeVeil vs LiteLLM

LiteLLM is a great open source gateway. ScopeVeil is the managed alternative with native Stripe billing, transparent markup, and a cost dashboard out of the box. Here is the unvarnished comparison.

Sign up in 60 seconds. Top up via Stripe when you are ready.

TL;DR

  • Stay on LiteLLM if you want to own the gateway, have ops capacity, and need access to the long tail of 100+ providers.
  • Try ScopeVeil if you want zero ops, native prepaid billing through Stripe, and a cost dashboard you do not have to wire up.
  • Migrating is two strings: baseURL and apiKey. Your OpenAI SDK does not change.

Feature-by-feature

Updated for what each platform actually shipped as of May 2026.

Feature ScopeVeil LiteLLM
OpenAI SDK compatible YesYes
Deployment model

Different bets. LiteLLM hands you the binary. ScopeVeil hands you a URL.

Managed SaaS; self-host on EnterpriseSelf-hosted; you run the proxy
Software cost

LiteLLM is genuinely free as software. The cost shows up as infra and on-call.

Usage-based: upstream cost + 5 to 15% markupFree, open source
Ops burden None. We run it.You run it, scale it, patch it, page on it
Native billing with prepaid credits Yes, Stripe-backed credits with transparent markupNot native; you build billing on top
Cost analytics dashboard Built-in, per-request, with XLSX exportLiteLLM Proxy ships a UI; deeper analytics require setup
Provider catalog

LiteLLM covers more providers. ScopeVeil curates first-party providers to keep cost accounting honest.

Curated set: OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral, Cohere, Groq, plus 9 more100+ providers supported
Support and SLA Email and dedicated channel on paid tiersCommunity support; commercial support via vendor
Self-hosted option Yes, on Enterprise (full stack in your VPC)Self-hosting is the default
Observability without the proxy

Two valid paths. ScopeVeil bundles it; LiteLLM lets you bring your own stack.

Yes, free up to 500k events/month via SDKIntegrates with external observability tools

Highlights mark areas where ScopeVeil has a clearly different posture today. LiteLLM is excellent open source. It is a different bet on who runs the gateway.

Why teams pick ScopeVeil

Three reasons that come up most often.

Zero ops, ever

No proxy to deploy, scale, or page on at 2 AM. We run the gateway, keep provider SDKs current, handle rate limits, and absorb upstream outages where we can. You ship product.

See the pricing calculator →

Billing that already works

Top up credits with Stripe, set hard caps, give clients or projects their own budget. The dashboard shows every request with upstream cost and your markup. No SQL, no Looker board to build first.

Read the security posture →

Real support, not GitHub issues

Paid tiers come with email and a dedicated channel. When a provider has an incident or a token counter drifts, you have someone to ping. Useful when your customers are waiting for the answer.

Quickstart in 60 seconds →

Migration is two strings.

If you are already on a self-hosted LiteLLM proxy, here is the diff.

client.ts
import OpenAI from 'openai';

const ai = new OpenAI({
-  baseURL: 'https://litellm.internal.acme.com/v1',
-  apiKey: process.env.LITELLM_MASTER_KEY,
+  baseURL: 'https://gateway.scopeveil.com/v1',
+  apiKey: process.env.SCOPEVEIL_KEY,
});

// Same SDK. Same model strings. Same response shape. No proxy to run.
const r = await ai.chat.completions.create({
  model: 'openai/gpt-4o-mini',
  messages: [{ role: 'user', content: 'hello' }],
});

That is the whole migration. You can decommission the LiteLLM deployment and its Postgres once you cut traffic over.

Common questions

Is ScopeVeil a drop-in replacement for LiteLLM?

For the common case, yes. Chat completions, streaming, tool calls, and embeddings all work through the OpenAI-compatible surface. LiteLLM has more providers in its catalog today; if you depend on one we have not shipped, check the catalog first.

Why would I pay for this when LiteLLM is free?

LiteLLM is free as software. It is not free as ops, infra, or billing engineering. ScopeVeil charges a transparent markup on upstream cost in exchange for the gateway running, the cost dashboard being there, and Stripe being wired up. If your team prefers to own the gateway, LiteLLM is a fine choice.

What about latency overhead?

A managed gateway adds a small fixed overhead on top of the upstream call, similar to a self-hosted proxy. For streaming requests we forward bytes as they arrive, so time-to-first-token tracks the upstream provider closely.

Can I run a hybrid setup?

Yes. Many teams keep LiteLLM for niche providers and route the high-volume providers (OpenAI, Anthropic, Google) through ScopeVeil to get the billing and dashboard. Use both behind a feature flag while you compare.

What if I outgrow the managed option?

The Enterprise plan ships the full stack as a docker-compose bundle that runs in your VPC. You get the same product, deployed the way LiteLLM users prefer. Pricing on the bundle is flat, not per-request.

Where is my data stored?

For the hosted gateway, request and response bodies are read in-memory for token counting and discarded. We persist metadata only (model, tokens, latency, cost, your tags). For the self-hosted bundle, nothing leaves your VPC.

Try the gateway in under a minute.

Top up via Stripe and send your first request in under a minute.