Honest comparison, May 2026

ScopeVeil vs Helicone

Helicone is a strong LLM observability product with an optional proxy. ScopeVeil bundles gateway, prepaid billing, and the same observability in one platform. Here is the unvarnished comparison.

Sign up in 60 seconds. Top up via Stripe when you are ready.

TL;DR

  • Stay on Helicone if you need the broadest integration catalog or async ingestion that keeps logging off the hot path.
  • Try ScopeVeil if you want a single product for the gateway, prepaid billing, and the cost dashboard, with transparent markup you can quote to finance.
  • Migrating is two strings: baseURL and apiKey. Drop the Helicone-Auth header and your OpenAI SDK does not change.

Feature-by-feature

Updated for what each platform actually shipped as of May 2026.

Feature ScopeVeil Helicone
OpenAI SDK compatible YesYes
Primary product surface

Helicone leads with analytics. ScopeVeil leads with a billable gateway plus the same analytics.

Gateway, billing, and observability bundledObservability with optional proxy
Native billing with prepaid credits Yes, Stripe-backed credits with transparent markupNot the primary product; you pay providers directly
Cost analytics with markup breakdown Built-in, per-request, with XLSX exportCost tracking based on observed usage
Observability without the proxy Yes, free up to 500k events/month via SDKYes, async logging available
Provider catalog

Helicone has broader integration coverage today. ScopeVeil keeps a curated set focused on first-party providers.

OpenAI, Anthropic, Google, Mistral, Cohere, Groq, plus 9 more200+ integrations across providers and frameworks
Proxy vs async ingest

Helicone lets you decouple logging from the request path. ScopeVeil keeps one mode to keep billing accurate.

Always proxy, single hopProxy mode or async ingestion
Self-hosted option Yes, on Enterprise (full stack in your VPC)Yes, available
Single login for gateway and analytics YesYes
Privacy posture

Both platforms take privacy seriously. ScopeVeil enforces it at the SDK schema level.

Operational metadata only; prompt content excluded by schema at ingestConfigurable; supports redaction and on-prem deployments

Highlights mark areas where ScopeVeil has a clearly different posture today. Helicone is a great product. It is a different bet on what the core surface should be.

Why teams pick ScopeVeil

Three reasons that come up most often.

Billing is the product, not a side feature

Top up credits with Stripe, set hard caps per project, and read every request with raw provider cost and your markup side by side. The dashboard exports XLSX for the monthly close.

See the pricing calculator →

Self-hosted is a real product

On the Enterprise tier the entire stack runs as a docker-compose bundle inside your own infrastructure. No request body ever crosses the boundary of your VPC. Useful when compliance, paranoia, or both is the constraint.

Read the security posture →

Observability without the proxy

Already routing your own provider keys? Drop in the SDK and get the same dashboard for free up to 500k events per month. You do not need to migrate traffic to get the analytics. The gateway is optional.

Quickstart in 60 seconds →

Migration is two strings.

If you are already on Helicone through the OpenAI SDK, here is the diff.

client.ts
import OpenAI from 'openai';

const ai = new OpenAI({
-  baseURL: 'https://oai.helicone.ai/v1',
-  apiKey: process.env.OPENAI_API_KEY,
-  defaultHeaders: { 'Helicone-Auth': `Bearer ${process.env.HELICONE_API_KEY}` },
+  baseURL: 'https://gateway.scopeveil.com/v1',
+  apiKey: process.env.SCOPEVEIL_KEY,
});

// Same SDK. Same model strings. Same response shape. One header less.
const r = await ai.chat.completions.create({
  model: 'openai/gpt-4o-mini',
  messages: [{ role: 'user', content: 'hello' }],
});

That is the whole migration. No proxy auth header, no separate provider key plumbing. One credential covers gateway and analytics.

Common questions

Is ScopeVeil a drop-in replacement for Helicone?

For the proxy use case, yes. Both expose an OpenAI-compatible HTTP API. Helicone also has async ingestion via SDK; ScopeVeil offers a comparable observability SDK that does not require the proxy if you want to keep your own routing.

How does the markup actually work?

Each request reserves an estimate, hits the upstream provider, then we charge the actual upstream cost plus your tier markup (5 to 15 percent). The dashboard splits the two so the markup is never hidden. With Helicone you typically pay providers directly and Helicone bills for the observability tier separately.

Can I keep my Helicone account while I test?

Of course. The two systems do not conflict. Most teams point one service at ScopeVeil first and compare the dashboards before switching the rest.

Does the gateway add latency over Helicone async logging?

Helicone async mode keeps logging off the hot path entirely. ScopeVeil always proxies, so there is a small fixed overhead on top of the upstream call. For streaming we forward bytes as they arrive, so time-to-first-token tracks upstream closely.

What if Helicone supports an integration ScopeVeil does not?

Helicone has a wider catalog of integrations today, particularly for framework-specific SDKs. If you need one we have not shipped, point a non-critical service at ScopeVeil first and let us know what is missing. We prioritize requests from teams running real traffic.

Where is my data stored?

For the hosted gateway, request and response bodies are read in-memory for token counting and discarded. We persist metadata only (model, tokens, latency, cost, your tags). For the self-hosted bundle, nothing leaves your VPC.

Try the gateway in under a minute.

Top up via Stripe and send your first request in under a minute.